7 Points to Successful Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
Successful Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a useful tool for trouble shooting breakdowns and efficiently coming to a solution. I propose the following seven points for successful implementation of RCA that will naturally result in increased profits.
Seven Points For Successful Root Cause Analysis
I. Describe the actual breakdown.
II. Define the physical phenomena of the breakdown.
III. Organize the details of the breakdown by using the ‘3W2H’ (with what, when, where, how, how much) tool.
IV. Work as a team, respecting each other’s expertise and knowledge, rather than individually.
V. Consider every possible cause of the breakdown.
VI. Verify all logical causes and eliminate all illogical causes.
VII. If determined that the cause of the breakdown was human error, separate that cause from the physical causes.
I. Describe the actual breakdown.
Describe all observations of the breakdown. Frequently people do not check the breakdown in detail. That is really dangerous way of finding causes, solving the problem. There should be a physical examination of the machines involved and a detailed description of the actual break. In not checking all aspects, there is a high probability of missing the cause. Every aspect must be checked.
II. Define the physical phenomena of the breakdown.
When you are looking for the cause of the breakdown, it is imperative that you define the problem to physical phenomena. For example: If the lamp is off, rather than just stop at problem’s phenomena, define ‘Lamp off ‘ in physical phenomena. If you define ‘lamp off’ to ‘electricity can’t go through lamp in the circuit’, you can get to problem essentially. This is a more exact and helpful description of the problem
III. Organize the details of the breakdown by using the ‘3W2H’
Do not make any assumptions when examining a problem. No two problems are exactly the same in nature and cause. Actually, it is extremely rare for the exact same breakdown to occur twice. Look at each problem as if you were looking at the situation for the first time. It looks like even though that cause is different, but their breakdown phenomena looks same. For each problem use: with what, when, where, how, and how much. In answering these questions from a new perspective each time, RCA will be more quickly achieved.
IV. Work as a team, respecting each other’s expertise and knowledge, rather than working individually.
The more input a problem from various perspectives, the better. Everyone will look at the problem differently, so it is to your advantage to seek the assistance of everyone involved in the situation from machine operators, supervisors and managers. One paper company, when their managers joined in an effort to improve their production, thought of a better design for a paper machine. The manufacture of the machine implemented their suggestions with very positive results.
V. Consider every possible cause of the breakdown.
Looking problems in the past may be helpful in determining your cause of the breakdown; however, you should take care in not limiting yourself to past causes. Every possible cause must be considered. All potential causes need to be cleared.
VI. Verify all logical causes and eliminate all illogical causes.
In processing cause analysis, you must consider all causes. It will become clear in the process that some causes will be illogical. Remove all illogical causes after careful examination. You can see they are logical or not by reversing it. Let’s look at the simple physical phenomena as an example. ‘Lamp off’ means ‘electricity cannot travel through the lamp’. If one of the causes of electricity cannot travel through the lamp is ‘fuse out’, so to find out whether this is appropriate or not, look if fuse is out, electricity cannot travel through the lamp. If it does, you can see that as a possibility of cause.
VII. If determined that the cause of the breakdown was human error, separate that cause from the physical causes.
In the process of team evaluation, it will become obvious that the cause of the breakdown was human error. It is important to separate the human error factors from the physical factors. If there is a human cause, the participation of attendees can be lower. So don’t except that possibility. Organize them separately and don’t leave out the physical causes.
Jinsso Kim
Related Articles
What we need to do today is make management aware through education and awareness that our cultures live with these chronic events that typically end up costing 100 times more than the occasional sporadic event. Unfortunately, the sporadic events get all the attention. When our cultures are enlightened, we will begin to enjoy the fruits of our efforts in the form of return on investment (ROI) figures as high as 7000-8000 percent. Then the believers will come.
What we need to do today is make management aware through education and awareness that our cultures live with these chronic events that typically end up costing 100 times more than the occasional sporadic event. Unfortunately, the sporadic events get all the attention. When our cultures are enlightened, we will begin to enjoy the fruits of our efforts in the form of return on investment (ROI) figures as high as 7000-8000 percent. Then the believers will come.
See More
I use the term RCPE because it is a waste of good initiatives and time to only find the root cause of a problem, but not fixing it. I like to use the word problem; a more common terminology is Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA), instead of failure because the word failure often leads to a focus on equipment and maintenance. The word problem includes all operational, quality, speed, high costs and other losses. To eliminate problems is a joint responsibility between operations, maintenance and engineering.
I use the term RCPE because it is a waste of good initiatives and time to only find the root cause of a problem, but not fixing it. I like to use the word problem; a more common terminology is Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA), instead of failure because the word failure often leads to a focus on equipment and maintenance. The word problem includes all operational, quality, speed, high costs and other losses. To eliminate problems is a joint responsibility between operations, maintenance and engineering.
See More
Hidden but powerful forces within our organizations are causing people to make serious mistakes. Until someone deals with these forces, they will continuously but unpredictably snare people into doing things they should not do. These forces are like a "trap," waiting to catch the next person. The most proactive of all industrial action might be to identify and remove these latent traps. But all our attempts to identify and remove these latent causes of failure start at the human. Humans do things "inappropriately," for "latent" reasons.
Hidden but powerful forces within our organizations are causing people to make serious mistakes. Until someone deals with these forces, they will continuously but unpredictably snare people into doing things they should not do. These forces are like a "trap," waiting to catch the next person. The most proactive of all industrial action might be to identify and remove these latent traps. But all our attempts to identify and remove these latent causes of failure start at the human. Humans do things "inappropriately," for "latent" reasons.
See More
I have heard one manager in a plant that has stipulated a maximum of two hours for an Root Cause Analysis to be conducted in his organisation. Another expects at least “brainstormed” solutions before the conclusion of day one – within 6 or 7 hours. It is not uncommon for a draft report to be required within 48 hours of the RCA. The following three tips may assist to meet tight deadlines and when time expectations are short. One advantage of the Apollo RCA process is that it is a fast process but the “driver” has to be on the ball to achieve the desired outcomes – effective solutions.
I have heard one manager in a plant that has stipulated a maximum of two hours for an Root Cause Analysis to be conducted in his organisation. Another expects at least “brainstormed” solutions before the conclusion of day one – within 6 or 7 hours. It is not uncommon for a draft report to be required within 48 hours of the RCA. The following three tips may assist to meet tight deadlines and when time expectations are short. One advantage of the Apollo RCA process is that it is a fast process but the “driver” has to be on the ball to achieve the desired outcomes – effective solutions.
See More
The power industry’s operating and maintenance practices were held up to intense regulator and public scrutiny when on November 6, 2007, a Massachusetts power plant’s steam-generating boiler exploded and three men died. The Department of Public Safety’s Incident Report investigation determined that the primary cause of the Dominion Energy New England’s Salem Harbor Generating Station Unit 3 explosion was extensive corrosion of boiler tubes
The power industry’s operating and maintenance practices were held up to intense regulator and public scrutiny when on November 6, 2007, a Massachusetts power plant’s steam-generating boiler exploded and three men died. The Department of Public Safety’s Incident Report investigation determined that the primary cause of the Dominion Energy New England’s Salem Harbor Generating Station Unit 3 explosion was extensive corrosion of boiler tubes
See More
When a bearing in a critical piece of equipment fails prematurely, a maintenance specialist knows the failure usually indicates there is more here than meets the eye. What the untutored eye sees is a failed bearing and little more. However, a premature bearing failure is symptomatic of other problems that, if left untreated, will cause the same kind of failure to occur again.
When a bearing in a critical piece of equipment fails prematurely, a maintenance specialist knows the failure usually indicates there is more here than meets the eye. What the untutored eye sees is a failed bearing and little more. However, a premature bearing failure is symptomatic of other problems that, if left untreated, will cause the same kind of failure to occur again.
See More
Semiconductor devices are almost always part of a larger, more complex piece of electronic equipment. These devices operate in concert with other circuit elements and are subject to system, subsystem and environmental influences. When equipment fails in the field or on the shop floor, technicians usually begin their evaluations with the unit's smallest, most easily replaceable module or subsystem. The subsystem is then sent to a lab, where technicians troubleshoot the problem to an individual component, which is then removed--often with less-than-controlled thermal, mechanical and electrical stresses--and submitted to a laboratory for analysis. Although this isn't the optimal failure analysis path, it is generally what actually happens.
Semiconductor devices are almost always part of a larger, more complex piece of electronic equipment. These devices operate in concert with other circuit elements and are subject to system, subsystem and environmental influences. When equipment fails in the field or on the shop floor, technicians usually begin their evaluations with the unit's smallest, most easily replaceable module or subsystem. The subsystem is then sent to a lab, where technicians troubleshoot the problem to an individual component, which is then removed--often with less-than-controlled thermal, mechanical and electrical stresses--and submitted to a laboratory for analysis. Although this isn't the optimal failure analysis path, it is generally what actually happens.
See More
