Creating a Spare Parts Holding List with Confidence
Jason Ballentine, ARMS Reliability
Spare Parts Holding List
As anyone with a hand in running a household knows, it’s important to keep a stockpile of key items. You certainly don’t want to find out the hard way that you’re on your last square of toilet paper! But in the case of a facility like a power plant, a missing spare part could be more than just a nuisance, it could be downright expensive.
The investment the utility company made to conduct a spare parts analysis ultimately resulted in a savings of 50 to 1.
Determining the appropriate spare parts to have on hand in a large facility, however, can be tricky. This is especially true after building a facility from the ground up, when you don’t have a frame of reference for which spare parts you’re most likely to need first.
Most organizations deal with this in one of two ways: 1) they guess or 2) they purchase according to a spares list provided by an equipment vendor.
A Reliability-Focused Purchase List
There are obvious limitations when it comes to guesswork. Making the wrong guess can result in huge expenses, either in unnecessary spare parts or in costly downtime. An equipment vendor’s suggested list probably would be somewhat more accurate, but such suggestions are unlikely to take into account the specific needs of your organization. A better way is approaching spare parts recommendations through the lens of reliability as it applies to each specific operation. As factors change, it’s important to reevaluate, making sure to take into account everything that could influence purchase priorities.
For example, recently a utility company sought to review the list of spare parts its equipment vendor had recommended. According to the equipment vendor, the utility needed to purchase $4.9 million worth of spare parts up-front. The utility wanted a second opinion before making such a sizable investment.
Spare Parts Analysis
The external reliability consultant started a spare parts analysis by looking at the list provided by the equipment vendor, then digging much deeper. A series of questions was explored, including: How often is this part likely to fail? What is the cost of the downtime if the part is attached to a critical piece of equipment? What is the unit cost of the spare part? What is the lead time to obtain a spare? Is this part likely to fail at any time throughout its lifecycle or is it only likely to fail at the end of its life? There is no point in purchasing a spare today if you are unlikely to need it for another 20 years.
In all, about 1,500 pieces of equipment were reviewed over 40 days before providing a recommended list of spares. The final spare parts holding list included some of what the equipment vendor had recommended, left off many of its recommended parts and suggested a few additional parts that weren’t on the original list.
The final critical spares list that was recommended included a total of $2.2 million in spare parts, a savings of $2.7 million over what the equipment vendor had originally recommended.
Built to Adapt
The reliability consultant’s recommended spare parts holding list is intended to be responsive to changing needs and new information. When the utility took a second look at its downtime cost and calculated that it was actually $10/megawatt and not the $23/megawatt it had initially determined, the consultant reevaluated the spares list, reducing the utility’s recommended purchases by another $200,000.
Spare Parts Holding List Conclusion
The investment the utility company made to conduct a spare parts analysis ultimately resulted in a savings of 50 to 1. Beyond the monetary benefit, the utility’s reliability engineer felt much more confident in the approach taken and was relieved in being able to avoid grossly overspending on spares.
If yours is like most organizations, you probably run into trouble when it comes to having the right spares on hand. Either you’re missing the right parts when something breaks down or you have expensive spares gathering dust and potentially going bad in storage. Getting a second opinion from a reliability-focused consultant takes the guesswork out of developing a critical spares list by taking into account item costs, the likelihood of failure, lead times, downtime costs and all other relevant factors.
Jason Ballentine
Jason Ballentine, CRL, CMRP, is the VP Engineering North America for ARMS Reliability. He is a reliability and maintenance strategy expert who oversees all of ARMS Reliability’s improvement projects across North America. Jason’s areas of expertise include maintenance strategy development, reliability-centered maintenance, system availability, reliability implementation programs, and root cause analysis facilitation and investigation.
Related Articles
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by CervecerÃa Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by CervecerÃa Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
See More
Have you heard of an automated kiosk? You won’t be late to any session, there will be no frustrations with seeking directions, and no getting lost in large facilities. You are in control. Your customer just had a great convention navigation experience.
Have you heard of an automated kiosk? You won’t be late to any session, there will be no frustrations with seeking directions, and no getting lost in large facilities. You are in control. Your customer just had a great convention navigation experience.
See More
In 2023, speed and accuracy are driving forces in the facilities management industry, to keep costs low, track and maintain assets and mechanicals and be always compliant. To do this, you need technology that’s easy to use and affordable. Using paper-based floor plans, maps, blueprints that are usually dog eared, stained, and filed away where nobody can find them is a recipe for disaster.
In 2023, speed and accuracy are driving forces in the facilities management industry, to keep costs low, track and maintain assets and mechanicals and be always compliant. To do this, you need technology that’s easy to use and affordable. Using paper-based floor plans, maps, blueprints that are usually dog eared, stained, and filed away where nobody can find them is a recipe for disaster.
See More
The cost of maintaining the status quo is enormous. The status quo affects each and every one of us every hour of every day, at work and at home. We have come to accept doing nothing as a safe and acceptable alternative. We even make it the default solution. Doing nothing is the management equivalent of a baby’s soother. It makes us feel safe and comfortable. But there is a cost to doing nothing.
The cost of maintaining the status quo is enormous. The status quo affects each and every one of us every hour of every day, at work and at home. We have come to accept doing nothing as a safe and acceptable alternative. We even make it the default solution. Doing nothing is the management equivalent of a baby’s soother. It makes us feel safe and comfortable. But there is a cost to doing nothing.
See More
The "breakthrough strategy" really works. Equipment becomes more reliable, costs go down, and behaviors change along the way. The key is focusing on results-the kind of results that will get people's attention on the plant floor as well as in the key decision makers' offices. Select the equipment that, if it ran better and was more reliable, would generate sizeable savings. But more importantly, choose equipment that would generate more throughput and revenue.
The "breakthrough strategy" really works. Equipment becomes more reliable, costs go down, and behaviors change along the way. The key is focusing on results-the kind of results that will get people's attention on the plant floor as well as in the key decision makers' offices. Select the equipment that, if it ran better and was more reliable, would generate sizeable savings. But more importantly, choose equipment that would generate more throughput and revenue.
See More
For the most part, we can describe in fairly exacting detail the functional components of a strong reliability program. Moreover, we are confident that implementing these reliability practices will yield results that benefit virtually every aspect of our business and provide distinct competitive advantage. However, we seldom see these reliability practices and results in an operating plant. This is what I call the Reliability Paradox.
For the most part, we can describe in fairly exacting detail the functional components of a strong reliability program. Moreover, we are confident that implementing these reliability practices will yield results that benefit virtually every aspect of our business and provide distinct competitive advantage. However, we seldom see these reliability practices and results in an operating plant. This is what I call the Reliability Paradox.
See More
In nearly all of the 250 or so equipment intensive plants and facilities I have visited, taught at, and worked in over the past 30 years, I have observed the relationships between the skills of employees and the reliability of the equipment. These observations may provide helpful insights for plant and facility managers who are troubled with unreliable equipment and high maintenance costs. Here are a few:
In nearly all of the 250 or so equipment intensive plants and facilities I have visited, taught at, and worked in over the past 30 years, I have observed the relationships between the skills of employees and the reliability of the equipment. These observations may provide helpful insights for plant and facility managers who are troubled with unreliable equipment and high maintenance costs. Here are a few:
See More
