Effective Benchmarking in Pursuit of Better Maintenance Operations
David Berger
Interfacing with Core CMMS Modules
Determine which functions hold the greatest opportunity for improving your maintenance operations, and look around for companies that show excellence in each target function. Summarized below are four of the more common functions that are of interest to modern maintenance operations, as well as sample target industries for benchmarking.
1. Service
The maintenance department provides service to the operations department – somewhat analogous to McDonald’s providing service to the general public. Maintenance could learn a great deal from the fast food industry with respect to attitude (smiles are free), manpower and capacity planning (demand is somewhat unpredictable), and order taking (fast food companies provide quick response times on their ‘work orders’).
The courier industry is also a good target for benchmarking. Large courier companies have excellent dispatch and mobile tracking systems for parcels, which are analogous to the tracking of maintenance jobs. Furthermore, they spend a great deal of time and effort in developing engineered work standards to improve the productivity and predictability of their processes. Some of the techniques used by the courier industry may be transferable in developing standards for repetitive maintenance tasks.
2. Supply Chain Management
When it comes to tight control of inventory from one end of the supply chain to the other, maintenance shops can learn a lot from pharmaceutical companies. Drugs must be carefully tracked such that if a bad batch is detected in the field, the entire lot can be recalled and the root cause of the problem found quickly.
Large retailers like Wal-Mart move a lot of material very efficiently. Retailers have developed world-class techniques for managing their suppliers, keeping inventory at an absolute minimum despite uncertain demand, expediting critical orders, ensuring constancy of supply, and utilizing warehousing space efficiently – a lot could be learnt from them.
3. Reliability Management
What should you do with the endless stream of equipment history data within your CMMS? The health care industry in the US provides an excellent example of how focus on reliability management can pay big dividends. Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO’s) have a mandate to maximize profit by maintaining the health of their clients. An HMO will bill its clients a premium. The premiums are then aggregated into the top line of a budget, and the HMO directs its energy into minimizing the downtime (ie, sickness) of its assets (ie, their clients).
Maintenance staff, in a production environment, are similar to the doctors working for an HMO in that in order to minimize costs, both must work efficiently and effectively to predict, prevent and correct failures of the assets for which they care. For example, doctors make use of encoded fields on ‘work orders’ to track the problem as reported by a patient, the cause, and corrective action taken. The HMO then uses statistical analysis to drive out the preventive measures that reduce high cost failures. As well, predictive models are built to understand who is at greatest risk, and how a failure can be avoided or its impact minimized.
4. Preventive Maintenance
Some companies have a superb reputation for having moved to a more planned environment. For example, airlines, airport authorities, and utilities cannot afford to have reactive-style maintenance operations. For the safety and convenience of the public, major emphasis is placed on preventive maintenance to avoid downtime. Although this may seem like an extremely costly approach for some maintenance shops, upon closer examination through benchmarking, it is surprising just how much is transferable.
Similarly, the military has an outstanding preventive maintenance program for their equipment, as evidenced by the various Middle East conflicts. Much was learnt by the military on the advantages of preventive maintenance over reactive maintenance, and how to do it right.
Effective Benchmarking Conclusion
In summary, do not narrow your scope to benchmarking only other maintenance operations in your industry. Instead, narrow your scope to those few processes that will yield the greatest improvement opportunity. Then broaden your search for benchmarking targets to any company in the world that exhibits excellence for those processes, including but not limited to maintenance operations.
Related Articles
Technical visionaries often invoke terms like the Internet of Things, smart machines and machine to machine (M2M) to ease our fears about managing the upcoming brain drain that accompanies the graying American industrial workforce. The theory goes that one day, self-learning machines and massively parallel computing may replace the operator. Perhaps, but not in the foreseeable future. That's because smart machines are very good at keeping us from doing dumb things, like stalling a commercial airliner, or pushing a gas compressor beyond safe tolerances. In the realm of black and white, the value of artificial intelligence is unassailable. But what about the rest of the time?
Technical visionaries often invoke terms like the Internet of Things, smart machines and machine to machine (M2M) to ease our fears about managing the upcoming brain drain that accompanies the graying American industrial workforce. The theory goes that one day, self-learning machines and massively parallel computing may replace the operator. Perhaps, but not in the foreseeable future. That's because smart machines are very good at keeping us from doing dumb things, like stalling a commercial airliner, or pushing a gas compressor beyond safe tolerances. In the realm of black and white, the value of artificial intelligence is unassailable. But what about the rest of the time?
See More
Why us, why now? In years past, the engineer, manager or superintendent was responsible for improvement ideas. Maintenance people were "hands" hired to do what they were told. Today, organizations are lean and mean; we need the capabilities of all maintainers. The downsizing craze, however, has left everyone in a managerial role with too many tasks and too little time. There's no one left to cut costs!
Why us, why now? In years past, the engineer, manager or superintendent was responsible for improvement ideas. Maintenance people were "hands" hired to do what they were told. Today, organizations are lean and mean; we need the capabilities of all maintainers. The downsizing craze, however, has left everyone in a managerial role with too many tasks and too little time. There's no one left to cut costs!
See More
When you think about the productivity of your workforce, a number of questions come into play. Are you meeting your daily goals? Have you correctly set benchmarks? Have the proper safety procedures been established and well-communicated with your team?
When you think about the productivity of your workforce, a number of questions come into play. Are you meeting your daily goals? Have you correctly set benchmarks? Have the proper safety procedures been established and well-communicated with your team?
See More
The maintenance impact on manufacturing results has traditionally been measured in terms of cost. As equipment reliability became a focus area in our industry, the strategic value of maintenance effectiveness became apparent to business leaders. For mill leaders, this brought the dilemma of balancing a need to reduce costs with an expectation that reliability must improve. From a total corporation view, wide disparity among site results establishes the need to lead and support change in maintenance performance. It is this kind of variability among sites that provides the opportunity to improve performance.
The maintenance impact on manufacturing results has traditionally been measured in terms of cost. As equipment reliability became a focus area in our industry, the strategic value of maintenance effectiveness became apparent to business leaders. For mill leaders, this brought the dilemma of balancing a need to reduce costs with an expectation that reliability must improve. From a total corporation view, wide disparity among site results establishes the need to lead and support change in maintenance performance. It is this kind of variability among sites that provides the opportunity to improve performance.
See More
In the world of production, the heartbeat of success lies in the delicate balance between keeping equipment running (continuous operation) and diving into the intricacies of troubleshooting for root causes. This dichotomy is the confluence of two distinct yet complementary approaches, each pivotal in its own right for maintaining efficiency and sustaining operations within industrial settings.
In the world of production, the heartbeat of success lies in the delicate balance between keeping equipment running (continuous operation) and diving into the intricacies of troubleshooting for root causes. This dichotomy is the confluence of two distinct yet complementary approaches, each pivotal in its own right for maintaining efficiency and sustaining operations within industrial settings.
See More
Today, facilities managers must add to their list of responsibilities the task of making the case for funding for critical maintenance tasks and improvements. Fortunately, the right tools for communicating this need to financial decision makers are readily at hand.
Today, facilities managers must add to their list of responsibilities the task of making the case for funding for critical maintenance tasks and improvements. Fortunately, the right tools for communicating this need to financial decision makers are readily at hand.
See More
A team of technical experts will make a thorough review of the building and its operating history. Led by a professional engineer or architect, they will review the original construction plans and specifications, if they are available. Then they will develop a specific reoccurring maintenance program, as well as a cost estimate, for each of the building's systems and load it on their computers.
A team of technical experts will make a thorough review of the building and its operating history. Led by a professional engineer or architect, they will review the original construction plans and specifications, if they are available. Then they will develop a specific reoccurring maintenance program, as well as a cost estimate, for each of the building's systems and load it on their computers.
See More
