Hiring of Maintenance Management Personnel – Top 10 Mistakes
Lori Davila and Louise Kursmark
Top Ten Hiring Mistakes in Hiring of Maintenance Management Personnel
Whether your company is large or small, whether you’re hiring an entry-level employee or a top executive, any one of the following mistakes can result in a hiring disaster for your organization. Recent Kennedy Information audio conference speaker Lori Davila and her co-author Louise Kursmark offer 10 key points for reviewing your organization’s hiring procedures and making adjustments where needed.
1. Not Knowing What You Are Looking For
If you’re like most hiring managers, you haven’t thought out the specific skills, behaviors, characteristics, motivators, and competencies that will indicate that person will be a top performer in your open position. If you don’t have a job description, work with others who are familiar with the position to develop one that is accurate.
2. Inadequate Interview Preparation
Most hiring managers give little thought to the interview. Executive search firm TD Madison and Associates cites a recent survey of hiring managers that revealed that more than 70 percent of all managers spend less than 5 minutes preparing for interviews.
3. Poor Selection of Interview Questions
Questions should be well prepared in advance and should be developed to reveal a candidate’s technical skills, knowledge, behaviors, like, dislikes and key motivators. It’s not enough to know whether a candidate can do the job. It’s equally important to know whether the person will fit your organization and whether the candidate will be motivated to do the job.
4. Hiring Too Quickly
If your primary business responsibilities do not include hiring, you might be tempted to fill openings too quickly so that you can do your real job. This can make you susceptible to candidates who interview well but lack the critical skills needed to perform the job successfully.
5. No Awareness of the Halo Effect
The halo effect occurs when you like a candidate because you find that you have something in common with that person. Perhaps she is from your hometown, he attended the same college as you, or the two of you share a common interest. Hiring is a lot like dating. Love at first sight can be blinding.
6. Hiring People Just Like You
Most people tend to choose candidates whose style and viewpoints are similar to their own. Many managers believe the key to hiring the best person for the job is to go with their gut and trust their intuition. Don’t let a good first impression unjustifiably influence you.
7. Raising Standards Unrealistically
Some managers are using the large volume of candidates as an opportunity to set unnecessarily high standards for open positions. This approach leads to hiring people who are overqualified for the position and unchallenged by it, a definite setup for future problems.
8. Using Only One Interviewer
The decision to fill a position is too important to have it hinge on one person’s contact with the candidate. Exposure to another interviewer could very well reveal aspects of the candidate that you might not have seen yourself.
9. Not Checking References Thoroughly
If you are being held accountable for your hiring decisions, you need to do your own reference checks. It is a good idea to talk to others who know the candidate in addition to references provided. With the candidate’s permission, try former employers, recognizing the limits of such sources. Look for consistency between the interview and the reference.
10. No Interviewing Process in Place
Are you using a highly subjective approach to making your hiring decision rather than a well thought out, structured and proven hiring process? The key to an interview’s effectiveness is the method with which it is prepared and delivered. Give this top priority and you can dramatically improve the performance levels of your organization – as can using all 10 of these recommendations.
“Hiring of Maintenance Management Personnel – Top 10 Mistakes” [Excerpted from How to Choose the Right Person for the Right Job Every Time by Lori Davila and Louise Kursmark (McGraw-Hill 2005].
Related Articles
When you ask front line supervisors or team leaders if all people in their teams are performing to the same standards or if some are doing more work and achieving more results than others, you will often get the same answer. All over the world, the most common answer, after some analysis, verifies that about 30% of the people do 70% of the work.
When you ask front line supervisors or team leaders if all people in their teams are performing to the same standards or if some are doing more work and achieving more results than others, you will often get the same answer. All over the world, the most common answer, after some analysis, verifies that about 30% of the people do 70% of the work.
See More
Unfettered expression and spiritual satisfaction? How does this relate to managing a maintenance department, especially one in the U.S. Postal Service? Open your mind. Take a page from the Zen Buddhist monks who preach: When you are quiet and listen, you become aware of sounds not normally heard. USPS maintenance leaders are listening and beginning to understand that maintenance success doesn't come through closed minds and closed doors.
Unfettered expression and spiritual satisfaction? How does this relate to managing a maintenance department, especially one in the U.S. Postal Service? Open your mind. Take a page from the Zen Buddhist monks who preach: When you are quiet and listen, you become aware of sounds not normally heard. USPS maintenance leaders are listening and beginning to understand that maintenance success doesn't come through closed minds and closed doors.
See More
It is not uncommon that many reliability and maintenance improvement initiatives fail to deliver expected results. Why is it so? Some of the most common causes I have observed include:
It is not uncommon that many reliability and maintenance improvement initiatives fail to deliver expected results. Why is it so? Some of the most common causes I have observed include:
See More
Why do improvement efforts fail or perhaps not sustain the gains? There are many reasons, but those most often stated are “lack of commitment” and not “following the process”. But why is there lack of commitment, and why aren’t processes followed? Here are a few of the reasons that I’ve seen:
Why do improvement efforts fail or perhaps not sustain the gains? There are many reasons, but those most often stated are “lack of commitment” and not “following the process”. But why is there lack of commitment, and why aren’t processes followed? Here are a few of the reasons that I’ve seen:
See More
When a piece of production machinery broke down at the Whirlpool plant in Findlay, Ohio, several years back, it was accepted practice for the machine operator to call maintenance and then sit back and wait for the problem to be fixed. Critical information and knowledge was not shared between the operator and maintenance technician. Like many companies, these workers were stuck in traditional roles - operators run the machines, maintenance fixes the machines, and the two do not cross. As a result, productivity opportunities were missed.
When a piece of production machinery broke down at the Whirlpool plant in Findlay, Ohio, several years back, it was accepted practice for the machine operator to call maintenance and then sit back and wait for the problem to be fixed. Critical information and knowledge was not shared between the operator and maintenance technician. Like many companies, these workers were stuck in traditional roles - operators run the machines, maintenance fixes the machines, and the two do not cross. As a result, productivity opportunities were missed.
See More
Many managers are unaware that best-in-class companies routinely design-out maintenance at the inception of a project. That, clearly, is the first key to highest equipment reliability and plant profitability. Whenever maintenance events occur as time goes on, the real industry leaders see every one of these events as an opportunity to upgrade. Indeed, upgrading is the second key, and upgrading is the job of highly trained, well-organized, knowledgeable reliability professionals.
Many managers are unaware that best-in-class companies routinely design-out maintenance at the inception of a project. That, clearly, is the first key to highest equipment reliability and plant profitability. Whenever maintenance events occur as time goes on, the real industry leaders see every one of these events as an opportunity to upgrade. Indeed, upgrading is the second key, and upgrading is the job of highly trained, well-organized, knowledgeable reliability professionals.
See More
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by Cervecería Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by Cervecería Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
See More
