[webinar] Embracing Digital Transformation in Maintenance & Plant Operations | March 13 at 10AM EST – Register Now
A Guide to Matching Electric Motors with Hydraulic Power Units
A Guide to Matching Electric Motors with Hydraulic Power Units
Ronald R. Gould, CFPE
Sizing electric motors correctly for hydraulic power units can save a sizable amount of money over the life of the equipment. If system pressure and flow are constant, motor sizing simply boils down to the standard equation:
hp = QP / 1714EM
where: hp is horsepower Q is flow in gpm P is pressure in psi, and EM is pump’s mechanical efficiency.
However, if the application requires different pressures during different parts of the operating cycle, you often can calculate root mean square (rms) horsepower and select a smaller, less-expensive motor. Along with the calculation of rms horsepower, the maximum torque required at the highest pressure level of the application also must be found. Actually the two calculations are quite simple.
For example, such an application might use a 6-gpm, 3450-rpm gear pump to power a cylinder linkage that operates for an 85-sec cycle. The system requires 3000 psi for the first 10 sec, 2200 psi for the next 30 sec, 1500 psi for the next 10 sec, and 2400 psi for the next 10 seconds. The pump then coasts at 500 psi for 20 sec, followed by 15 sec with the motor off.
It’s tempting to use the standard formula, plug in the highest-pressure segment of the cycle, and then calculate:
hp = (6)(3000) / (1714)(0.9) = 11.7 hp for 10 sec.
To provide this horsepower, some designers would choose a 10-hp motor; others would be ultra-conservative and use a 15-hp motor; a few might take a chance with 7.5 hp. These motors in open drip-proof C-face models with feet would list at about $570, $800, and $400 respectively, so there could be savings of $170 to $400 per power unit by choosing the 7.5-hp motor – if it will do the job.
To determine this, first calculate the horsepower for each pressure segment of the cycle:
hp1 = 6(2200) / (1714)(0.9) = 8.5 hp for 30 sec. hp2 = 6(1500) / (1714)(0.9) = 5.8 hp for 10 sec. hp3 = 6(500) / (1714)(0.9) = 1.9 hp for 30 sec.
The rms horsepower is calculated by taking the square root of the sum of these horsepowers squared, multiplied by the time interval at that horsepower, and divided by the sum of the times plus the term (toff /F), as indicated in the box at the bottom of this page.
Substituting the example values into the boxed equation and solving reveals that hprms equals 7.2. Thus, a 7.5-hp motor can be used from the standpoint of horsepower alone. However the second item, maximum torque, still must be checked before reaching a final decision. The maximum torque required to drive this particular pump will be found at the highest pressure – because the gear pump’s output flow is constant. Use this equation:
T = DP / (12)(6.28)EM
where: T is torque in ft-lb, and D is displacement in in.3
For this example, D = (6)(231) / (3450) = 0.402 in.3 Then T = (0.402)(3000) / (12)(6.28)(0.9) = 17.8 ft-lb.
Because electric motors running at 3450 rpm generate 1.5 ft-lb per hp, the 17.8 ft-lb of torque requires (17.8 / 1.5) or 11.9 hp at 3000 psi. This checks out closely enough for the example application. (At other standard motor speeds: 1725 rpm generates 3 ft-lb per hp; 1150 rpm, 4.5 ft-lb per hp; 850, 6 ft-lb per hp.)
Now the second criteria can be checked against what the suggested motor can deliver in torque. What is the pull-up torque of the 7.5-hp motor selected? Because the torque is least as the motor accelerates from 0 to 3450 rpm, it must be above 11.9 ft-lb with an acceptable safety margin. Note that a motor running 10% low on voltage will produce only 81% of rated pull-up torque: i.e., (208/230)2 = 0.81. Reviewing motor manufacturers’ performance curves will show several available 7.5-hp models with higher pull-up torque. Any of these motors could be a good choice for this application.
Both motor criteria now have been verified to match the motor with the appropriate hydraulic power unit. The rms horsepower is equal to or less than the rated motor’s horsepower. The motor’s pull-up torque is greater than the maximum required.
Pneumatic directional control valves and cylinders are most commonly used in power circuits, with the valves controlling cylinders that, in turn, provide work. As we learn about a few of these circuits, other accessory valves will be introduced, along with some interesting ways of using them.
Pneumatic directional control valves and cylinders are most commonly used in power circuits, with the valves controlling cylinders that, in turn, provide work. As we learn about a few of these circuits, other accessory valves will be introduced, along with some interesting ways of using them.
Safety is critical in this industry, especially for applications in potentially explosive environments. Introducing the new IE5 SynRM Increased Safety motors represents a game changer, giving chemical manufacturers access to the most energy-efficient motor and drive technology. The new motors offer up to 40 percent lower energy losses than commonly used IE3 motors while meeting stringent safety standards.Â
Safety is critical in this industry, especially for applications in potentially explosive environments. Introducing the new IE5 SynRM Increased Safety motors represents a game changer, giving chemical manufacturers access to the most energy-efficient motor and drive technology. The new motors offer up to 40 percent lower energy losses than commonly used IE3 motors while meeting stringent safety standards.Â
Threaded fasteners set and hold tolerances on assemblies ranging from light-duty equipment to heavy machinery. Loosening is one of the major causes of industrial equipment failure, and results in millions of dollars worth of unscheduled downtime costs each year. In many cases, fasteners that self-loosen during equipment operation may contribute to wear and fatigue, and result in poor operating tolerances, misalignment and even catastrophic equipment failure. Various types of differential stresses such as vibration and shock, thermal expansion and contraction, and micro-movement reduce clamping force on the assembly and ultimately cause failure.
Threaded fasteners set and hold tolerances on assemblies ranging from light-duty equipment to heavy machinery. Loosening is one of the major causes of industrial equipment failure, and results in millions of dollars worth of unscheduled downtime costs each year. In many cases, fasteners that self-loosen during equipment operation may contribute to wear and fatigue, and result in poor operating tolerances, misalignment and even catastrophic equipment failure. Various types of differential stresses such as vibration and shock, thermal expansion and contraction, and micro-movement reduce clamping force on the assembly and ultimately cause failure.
Machinery can be idle from intermittent use, stand-by (redundancy), storage for spare parts, or for temporary decommissioning. This article looks at practices that protect equipment characterized as decommissioned, short-term storage or storage of stand-by capacity.
Machinery can be idle from intermittent use, stand-by (redundancy), storage for spare parts, or for temporary decommissioning. This article looks at practices that protect equipment characterized as decommissioned, short-term storage or storage of stand-by capacity.
Most of us who have spent time in the lubrication field have been told that it takes only a small amount of water (less than 500 ppm) to substantially shorten the service life of rolling element bearings. There is indeed a vast amount of research that supports these assertions. Being a career-long crusader of clean and dry oil, I will certainly not argue the contrary. In fact, water's destructive effects on bearings can easily reach or exceed that of particle contamination, depending on the conditions. Water can even cause bearing failure.
Most of us who have spent time in the lubrication field have been told that it takes only a small amount of water (less than 500 ppm) to substantially shorten the service life of rolling element bearings. There is indeed a vast amount of research that supports these assertions. Being a career-long crusader of clean and dry oil, I will certainly not argue the contrary. In fact, water's destructive effects on bearings can easily reach or exceed that of particle contamination, depending on the conditions. Water can even cause bearing failure.
There are occasions when you might want to permanently change the amount of fluid you are pumping, or change the discharge head of a centrifugal pump. There are four ways you could do this, of the four methods the middle two are the only sensible ones. In the following paragraphs we will learn what happens when we change either the pump speed or impeller diameter and as you would guess other characteristics of the pump are going to change along with speed or diameter.
There are occasions when you might want to permanently change the amount of fluid you are pumping, or change the discharge head of a centrifugal pump. There are four ways you could do this, of the four methods the middle two are the only sensible ones. In the following paragraphs we will learn what happens when we change either the pump speed or impeller diameter and as you would guess other characteristics of the pump are going to change along with speed or diameter.
My interest in writing this article was to explore one way to reduce the cost of manufacturing and installing new boilers: improved insulation practices within the boiler island. It is my opinion that the power industry requires a smarter and more economical insulation design on steam-generating boiler walls, especially when considering the rising cost and reduced availability of qualified field labor. Yes, the potential cost savings with improved insulation practices is small compared to the total plant cost, but every dollar saved is important.
My interest in writing this article was to explore one way to reduce the cost of manufacturing and installing new boilers: improved insulation practices within the boiler island. It is my opinion that the power industry requires a smarter and more economical insulation design on steam-generating boiler walls, especially when considering the rising cost and reduced availability of qualified field labor. Yes, the potential cost savings with improved insulation practices is small compared to the total plant cost, but every dollar saved is important.
