What is Total Productive Maintenance?
Jordy Byrd
Another trite phrase has the answer: The weakest link in a chain is the strongest because it can break it.
Preventive and routine maintenance models help alleviate downtime and boost overall production. The most popular method is Total Productive Maintenance (TPM).
TPM brings maintenance into focus as a vital part of business. Maintenance downtime is included in manufacturing scheduling, and in many cases, becomes an integral part of the manufacturing process. TPM assigns the responsibility for preventative and routine maintenance to the same people who operate that individual equipment. This puts the people most familiar with the machine in charge of its care.
Total Productive Maintenance is built on the 5S foundation, which creates effective workplace organization and standardized procedures to improve safety, quality, productivity, and employee attitudes.
In the most basic sense, the three goals of TPM are:
- Zero unplanned failures (no small stops or slow running)
- Zero product defects
- Zero accidents
The Eight Pillars of TPM
As with the entire body of lean manufacturing systems – TPM originated in Japan. An organization called the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) formed in 1961, although under a different moniker, and unveiled the TPM concept a decade later. The Japanese automotive supplier Nippondenso is first credited with utilizing the process, and Seiichi Nakajima of JIPM established eight management pillars, for which TMP is well-known today.
TPM aims to increase productivity, efficiency, and safety by empowering operators and team leaders to play a proactive role in day-to-day lubrication, inspection, and cleaning. Management is tasked with creating a “buy-in culture” to support continuous activities through eight pillars of activity.
The eight pillars of Total Productive Maintenance include:
- Autonomous Maintenance:Â Operators monitor the condition of their own equipment and work areas
- Process & Machine Improvement: Team leaders collect information from operators and work areas, then prioritize preventative maintenance and improvements
- Preventative Maintenance: Operators and team leaders share preventative maintenance tasks and schedules
- Early Management of New Equipment: Team leaders anticipate and plan for parts of equipment lifecycles and report to mangers, based on maintenance reports
- Process Quality Management: Shared responsibility for operation and maintenance encourages quality improvement ideas from all areas of work
- Administrative Work: Managers prioritize data from the previous pillars and share outcomes with team leaders and work areas
- Education & Training: Continuous improvement includes operator and work area education and training which improves morale, retention and efficiency
- Safety & Sustained Success: Facility-wide safety is prioritized, which positively impacts sustained success of the TPM program
As maintenance is traditionally considered an inevitable and “not-for-profit” function, Total Productive Maintenance is considered the most difficult lean manufacturing tool to implement. Shifting cultural beliefs within a facility, from the CEO to machinists and janitors, may take years but the pay off for both the finished product and employee morale is worth the investment.
Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance
JIMP still operates today, as both a survey and research facility testing Total Productive Maintenance technologies. The organization is currently researching the aging of equipment life, and state-of-the-art maintenance technology and repair.
According to JIMP, there are two types of aging of equipment life:
- Aging of equipment itself: The product life of the equipment itself comes to an end (aging of parts, fatigue in spindles and foundation, paint deterioration of buildings, towers and vessels, and increase in discontinued products).
- Aging of functions independent from aging of the equipment: The product life of the equipment itself has not ended (incapacity or inability to meet required quality, stricter requirements on quality and obsolescence with products in the market).
Companies have taken advanced approaches to predicting when a machine will break down. Two metrics used are Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and Total Effective Equipment Performance (TEEP).
- OEE quantifies how well a manufacturing unit performs relative to its designed capacity, during the periods when it is scheduled to run
- TEEP measures OEE against calendar hours
While state-of-the-art technologies for equipment life prediction are advanced, JIMP claims it’s difficult to predict the month-by-month deterioration of machinery that has been used for 30 years.
The organization is currently utilizing equipment diagnostic technology and the data analysis system, to provide maintenance best practices in industries such as assembly processing, automobiles, semiconductors, and food.
Jordy Byrd is a public relations specialist from Graphic Products, who writes about industrial safety, lean manufacturing, and visual communication. www.graphicproducts.com
Related Articles
Christer Idhammar of IDCON INC presents the implementation steps you need to take if you want to be successful in improving reliability and maintenance, sustain that improvement, and continue to improve after that.
Christer Idhammar of IDCON INC presents the implementation steps you need to take if you want to be successful in improving reliability and maintenance, sustain that improvement, and continue to improve after that.
See More
The question of whether managed in-house maintenance or contract maintenance is superior is a persistent one, and both options present unique challenges. Administration, for instance, can be a minefield regardless of the chosen path. A maintenance agreement contract, for example, is a broad subject that can lead to numerous issues if not carefully drafted and agreed upon. This means that in-house maintenance isn't always the straightforward solution it might seem to be.
The question of whether managed in-house maintenance or contract maintenance is superior is a persistent one, and both options present unique challenges. Administration, for instance, can be a minefield regardless of the chosen path. A maintenance agreement contract, for example, is a broad subject that can lead to numerous issues if not carefully drafted and agreed upon. This means that in-house maintenance isn't always the straightforward solution it might seem to be.
See More
As an option to reduce plant costs, plant managers may consider contracting out maintenance work. This may have some merit, depending on many factors, including the nature of the business. One question that may be asked is, "Is maintenance a part of our 'core business'?" Let's look at a couple of examples. If the business is a hospital, where revenue is generated by the sale of medical services, and maintenance consists of a few specialized activities, such as janitorial, H&V system servicing, and repair of advanced medical diagnostic and monitoring systems, then contracting out these activities is almost certainly the best approach.
As an option to reduce plant costs, plant managers may consider contracting out maintenance work. This may have some merit, depending on many factors, including the nature of the business. One question that may be asked is, "Is maintenance a part of our 'core business'?" Let's look at a couple of examples. If the business is a hospital, where revenue is generated by the sale of medical services, and maintenance consists of a few specialized activities, such as janitorial, H&V system servicing, and repair of advanced medical diagnostic and monitoring systems, then contracting out these activities is almost certainly the best approach.
See More
Ignorance is contagious and you are the only one to save the day, according to maintenance expert Joel Levitt who shares the ten things your management needs to know NOW.
Ignorance is contagious and you are the only one to save the day, according to maintenance expert Joel Levitt who shares the ten things your management needs to know NOW.
See More
Current reliability calculations are predisposed to a single failure mode or mechanism and assume a constant failure rate, while research being carried out by the Center for Risk and Reliability at the University of Maryland implies that reliability is a function of the level of damage a system can sustain, with the operational environment, operating conditions and operational envelope determining the rate of damage growth.
Current reliability calculations are predisposed to a single failure mode or mechanism and assume a constant failure rate, while research being carried out by the Center for Risk and Reliability at the University of Maryland implies that reliability is a function of the level of damage a system can sustain, with the operational environment, operating conditions and operational envelope determining the rate of damage growth.
See More
The maintenance impact on manufacturing results has traditionally been measured in terms of cost. As equipment reliability became a focus area in our industry, the strategic value of maintenance effectiveness became apparent to business leaders. For mill leaders, this brought the dilemma of balancing a need to reduce costs with an expectation that reliability must improve. From a total corporation view, wide disparity among site results establishes the need to lead and support change in maintenance performance. It is this kind of variability among sites that provides the opportunity to improve performance.
The maintenance impact on manufacturing results has traditionally been measured in terms of cost. As equipment reliability became a focus area in our industry, the strategic value of maintenance effectiveness became apparent to business leaders. For mill leaders, this brought the dilemma of balancing a need to reduce costs with an expectation that reliability must improve. From a total corporation view, wide disparity among site results establishes the need to lead and support change in maintenance performance. It is this kind of variability among sites that provides the opportunity to improve performance.
See More
The "breakthrough strategy" really works. Equipment becomes more reliable, costs go down, and behaviors change along the way. The key is focusing on results-the kind of results that will get people's attention on the plant floor as well as in the key decision makers' offices. Select the equipment that, if it ran better and was more reliable, would generate sizeable savings. But more importantly, choose equipment that would generate more throughput and revenue.
The "breakthrough strategy" really works. Equipment becomes more reliable, costs go down, and behaviors change along the way. The key is focusing on results-the kind of results that will get people's attention on the plant floor as well as in the key decision makers' offices. Select the equipment that, if it ran better and was more reliable, would generate sizeable savings. But more importantly, choose equipment that would generate more throughput and revenue.
See More
