The Fuzzy Side of Equipment Reliability
Robert M. Williamson, Strategic Work Systems, Inc.
In nearly all of the 250 or so equipment intensive plants and facilities I have visited, taught at, and worked in over the past 30 years, I have observed the relationships between the skills of employees and the equipment reliability. These observations may provide helpful insights for facility and plant managers who are troubled with unreliable equipment and high maintenance costs. Here are a few:
Observation Number 1
There is a direct correlation between the way the plant-floor people are treated and the reliability of the equipment for which they are responsible. Clean and reliable equipment usually means employees needs are regularly addressed. The people are listened to. And the same applies to the equipment-its needs are also regularly addressed. The equipment needs are “listened to.” Responding in a proactive manner to people typically results in proactive maintenance of the equipment. A work culture of “equipment ownership” develops.
Observation Number 2
The highest levels of equipment reliability exist where skilled maintenance people operate the equipment. Likewise, the lowest levels of equipment reliability exist where unskilled or semi-skilled people operate the equipment. There is a direct correlation between equipment reliability and the equipment-specific skills and knowledge of equipment operators.
What can we conclude from these two observations? Equipment-specific skills and knowledge improve equipment reliability. The positive attitudes of employees lead to more reliable equipment. Not exactly rocket science, is it? So why don’t all managers and supervisors, all levels of decision-makers and leaders, in a business emphasize the well-being of their people and equipment alike? This is a real mystery to me.
Observation Number 3
In the United States, we are firmly in an era where there is a shortage of skilled employees in manufacturing and maintenance. Fewer young people are being encouraged to undertake that kind of work. There is a trend of having operators perform routine maintenance on their equipment. This trend makes sense only if handled properly-the right tasks, the right training, the right people, for the right reasons. However, overall productivity can suffer if “downsizing” maintenance results in more operator-performed maintenance that takes time away from their “operating” job roles and responsibilities. There must be a careful balance.
Observation Number 4
We are in another cyclical era of improving performance by “cutting costs.” Often, cost-cutting programs have a negative impact on employees’ workloads and/or attitudes, which can be directly linked to more equipment reliability problems. This increases costs and reduces operating efficiency or throughput. A vicious cycle, no doubt. It appears easier to look at overall cost reductions rather than finding ways to reduce the cost per unit produced by improving equipment reliability and work processes.
A vision of the future of equipment reliability…
Reliable equipment reduces the overall operating cost by producing more first-pass quality production during the scheduled time available. People waiting for “maintenance” to fix their equipment, people waiting for the product at the next stages in the process, in-process inventory buffers, and customers waiting for their orders all add up to significant losses. These losses are exponentially higher than the actual cost of the emergency, reactive repair. Unreliable equipment is not necessarily a positive motivator of people either. If left unchanged, unreliable equipment leads to more unreliable equipment and then the “escalating costs must be cut!” Remember that there is a direct correlation between the reliability of the equipment and the way the plantfloor people are treated.
Henry Ford said it best when describing the Ford principles of management in his 1926 book, Today and Tomorrow:
“Put all machinery in the best possible condition, keep it that way, and insist on absolute cleanliness everywhere in order that a man may learn to respect his tools, his surroundings, and himself.”
This was one of the many concepts from Ford Motor Company that led to the development of the Toyota Production System, Total Productive Maintenance, and just-in-time manufacturing from the early 1900’s through the 1970’s in Japan.
The future of equipment-intensive businesses will always depend on the people who operate and maintain the equipment and their ongoing dialogue with those who design, build, and manufacture the equipment. There is no way around it: People, the work processes they use, and the equipment they work on are the roots of productivity in the workplace of the 1920’s and the workplace of the future.
Robert Williamson is the Owner of Strategic Work Systems Inc. He can be contacted by email at: [email protected].
Related Articles
When you ask front line supervisors or team leaders if all people in their teams are performing to the same standards or if some are doing more work and achieving more results than others, you will often get the same answer. All over the world, the most common answer, after some analysis, verifies that about 30% of the people do 70% of the work.
When you ask front line supervisors or team leaders if all people in their teams are performing to the same standards or if some are doing more work and achieving more results than others, you will often get the same answer. All over the world, the most common answer, after some analysis, verifies that about 30% of the people do 70% of the work.
See More
Unfettered expression and spiritual satisfaction? How does this relate to managing a maintenance department, especially one in the U.S. Postal Service? Open your mind. Take a page from the Zen Buddhist monks who preach: When you are quiet and listen, you become aware of sounds not normally heard. USPS maintenance leaders are listening and beginning to understand that maintenance success doesn't come through closed minds and closed doors.
Unfettered expression and spiritual satisfaction? How does this relate to managing a maintenance department, especially one in the U.S. Postal Service? Open your mind. Take a page from the Zen Buddhist monks who preach: When you are quiet and listen, you become aware of sounds not normally heard. USPS maintenance leaders are listening and beginning to understand that maintenance success doesn't come through closed minds and closed doors.
See More
It is not uncommon that many reliability and maintenance improvement initiatives fail to deliver expected results. Why is it so? Some of the most common causes I have observed include:
It is not uncommon that many reliability and maintenance improvement initiatives fail to deliver expected results. Why is it so? Some of the most common causes I have observed include:
See More
Why do improvement efforts fail or perhaps not sustain the gains? There are many reasons, but those most often stated are “lack of commitment” and not “following the process”. But why is there lack of commitment, and why aren’t processes followed? Here are a few of the reasons that I’ve seen:
Why do improvement efforts fail or perhaps not sustain the gains? There are many reasons, but those most often stated are “lack of commitment” and not “following the process”. But why is there lack of commitment, and why aren’t processes followed? Here are a few of the reasons that I’ve seen:
See More
When a piece of production machinery broke down at the Whirlpool plant in Findlay, Ohio, several years back, it was accepted practice for the machine operator to call maintenance and then sit back and wait for the problem to be fixed. Critical information and knowledge was not shared between the operator and maintenance technician. Like many companies, these workers were stuck in traditional roles - operators run the machines, maintenance fixes the machines, and the two do not cross. As a result, productivity opportunities were missed.
When a piece of production machinery broke down at the Whirlpool plant in Findlay, Ohio, several years back, it was accepted practice for the machine operator to call maintenance and then sit back and wait for the problem to be fixed. Critical information and knowledge was not shared between the operator and maintenance technician. Like many companies, these workers were stuck in traditional roles - operators run the machines, maintenance fixes the machines, and the two do not cross. As a result, productivity opportunities were missed.
See More
Many managers are unaware that best-in-class companies routinely design-out maintenance at the inception of a project. That, clearly, is the first key to highest equipment reliability and plant profitability. Whenever maintenance events occur as time goes on, the real industry leaders see every one of these events as an opportunity to upgrade. Indeed, upgrading is the second key, and upgrading is the job of highly trained, well-organized, knowledgeable reliability professionals.
Many managers are unaware that best-in-class companies routinely design-out maintenance at the inception of a project. That, clearly, is the first key to highest equipment reliability and plant profitability. Whenever maintenance events occur as time goes on, the real industry leaders see every one of these events as an opportunity to upgrade. Indeed, upgrading is the second key, and upgrading is the job of highly trained, well-organized, knowledgeable reliability professionals.
See More
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by Cervecería Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by Cervecería Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
See More
