Failure Teaches Success
BR. Keith Mobley, Principal SME, Life Cycle Engineering – As appeared in the July 2014 Edition of Reflections on Excellence
I absolutely hate to fail, but must admit that failure is an unescapable part of life. Thankfully most of my failures over the years have been relatively minor. Nonetheless, they have been a true source of irritation and frustration that in many ways outweigh the successes. Fortunately my early mentors taught me to use failure, no matter how serious or minor, as a learning tool and a platform to build upon. That lesson, combined with Mobley’s 10th Law, “Making the same mistake twice is unforgivable”, has played a major role in my successful journey over the past five decades. With each failure, my knowledge and expertise increased, enabling faster and surer growth.
Unfortunately the same cannot always be said for others. Over the years I have observed far too many people who are paralyzed by the fear of failure. They would rather do nothing than take a chance of doing something that causes, or appears to cause, failure. In part, this fear has been created by a corporate culture that is quick to assign blame, real or perceived, on the closest available person. Beginning in the mid-1960s, this scapegoat culture has grown and spread widely until today it is the dominant culture worldwide. As a result, many corporations are literally paralyzed from the factory floor to the boardroom. Everyone, regardless of organizational level, is so afraid of making or being blamed for a mistake that performance, behaviors and work culture are frozen in a state that is well below best-in-class. Moreover, change is virtually impossible in an environment where fear of failure—another word for change—is the dominant driving force.
It should be obvious that a fear-of-failure-based culture is not conducive to excellence—or even mediocre performance—but few question and most seem content within it. These organizations are easy to spot. Morale on the factory floor, as well as among those in higher levels of the organization who recognize the need for change, is low and getting worse. This degrading morale is caused by frustration with an infrastructure and management style that ignores obvious problems, by default encourages mediocrity throughout the organization, and is absolutely afraid to change.
Before you object to this line of thinking, stop and think about your last decision-making meeting. Did you arrive at a decisive decision, one that effectively addressed and will resolve the real issue? Are you sure? In my role as a “corporate fixer” and later as an executive advisor, I have led or observed hundreds, if not thousands, of these decision-making meetings. In the best of circumstances, it is extremely difficult to get the team to agree upon a specific problem and its forcing functions and even more difficult to gain support for a viable solution. In a culture bound by fear—fear of being blamed for failure—it is virtually impossible. The team is truly paralyzed into inactivity.
The only hope for these organizations is an absolute and complete culture change. Fear must be replaced with the realization that mistakes and failures are to be expected—they are truly a part of both our personal and business lives. We all must learn to accept these setbacks, learn from them and implement corrective actions that will prevent recurrence. In this way, each failure makes the organization stronger, as well as reduces the potential for future failures. But remember, one can never outgrow failures. We must strive to prevent them, but not to the point of being paralyzed by fear of failure, and we must always, always learn from them.
MOBLEY’S 37th LAW: “Failure teaches success.”
Keith Mobley has earned an international reputation as one of the premier consultants in the fields of plant performance optimization, reliability engineering, predictive maintenance and effective management. He has more than 35 years of direct experience in corporate management, process design and troubleshooting. For the past 16 years, he has helped hundreds of clients worldwide achieve and sustain world-class performance. Keith can be reached at [email protected].
© 2014 Life Cycle Engineering, Inc.
Related Articles
When you ask front line supervisors or team leaders if all people in their teams are performing to the same standards or if some are doing more work and achieving more results than others, you will often get the same answer. All over the world, the most common answer, after some analysis, verifies that about 30% of the people do 70% of the work.
When you ask front line supervisors or team leaders if all people in their teams are performing to the same standards or if some are doing more work and achieving more results than others, you will often get the same answer. All over the world, the most common answer, after some analysis, verifies that about 30% of the people do 70% of the work.
See More
Unfettered expression and spiritual satisfaction? How does this relate to managing a maintenance department, especially one in the U.S. Postal Service? Open your mind. Take a page from the Zen Buddhist monks who preach: When you are quiet and listen, you become aware of sounds not normally heard. USPS maintenance leaders are listening and beginning to understand that maintenance success doesn't come through closed minds and closed doors.
Unfettered expression and spiritual satisfaction? How does this relate to managing a maintenance department, especially one in the U.S. Postal Service? Open your mind. Take a page from the Zen Buddhist monks who preach: When you are quiet and listen, you become aware of sounds not normally heard. USPS maintenance leaders are listening and beginning to understand that maintenance success doesn't come through closed minds and closed doors.
See More
It is not uncommon that many reliability and maintenance improvement initiatives fail to deliver expected results. Why is it so? Some of the most common causes I have observed include:
It is not uncommon that many reliability and maintenance improvement initiatives fail to deliver expected results. Why is it so? Some of the most common causes I have observed include:
See More
Why do improvement efforts fail or perhaps not sustain the gains? There are many reasons, but those most often stated are “lack of commitment” and not “following the process”. But why is there lack of commitment, and why aren’t processes followed? Here are a few of the reasons that I’ve seen:
Why do improvement efforts fail or perhaps not sustain the gains? There are many reasons, but those most often stated are “lack of commitment” and not “following the process”. But why is there lack of commitment, and why aren’t processes followed? Here are a few of the reasons that I’ve seen:
See More
When a piece of production machinery broke down at the Whirlpool plant in Findlay, Ohio, several years back, it was accepted practice for the machine operator to call maintenance and then sit back and wait for the problem to be fixed. Critical information and knowledge was not shared between the operator and maintenance technician. Like many companies, these workers were stuck in traditional roles - operators run the machines, maintenance fixes the machines, and the two do not cross. As a result, productivity opportunities were missed.
When a piece of production machinery broke down at the Whirlpool plant in Findlay, Ohio, several years back, it was accepted practice for the machine operator to call maintenance and then sit back and wait for the problem to be fixed. Critical information and knowledge was not shared between the operator and maintenance technician. Like many companies, these workers were stuck in traditional roles - operators run the machines, maintenance fixes the machines, and the two do not cross. As a result, productivity opportunities were missed.
See More
Many managers are unaware that best-in-class companies routinely design-out maintenance at the inception of a project. That, clearly, is the first key to highest equipment reliability and plant profitability. Whenever maintenance events occur as time goes on, the real industry leaders see every one of these events as an opportunity to upgrade. Indeed, upgrading is the second key, and upgrading is the job of highly trained, well-organized, knowledgeable reliability professionals.
Many managers are unaware that best-in-class companies routinely design-out maintenance at the inception of a project. That, clearly, is the first key to highest equipment reliability and plant profitability. Whenever maintenance events occur as time goes on, the real industry leaders see every one of these events as an opportunity to upgrade. Indeed, upgrading is the second key, and upgrading is the job of highly trained, well-organized, knowledgeable reliability professionals.
See More
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by Cervecería Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
The true translation — might it be proper to say a new and improved translation? — is being used today by Cervecería Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, one of the largest brewers of beer in Latin America. Known throughout this company as Mantenimiento Alto Desempeño (MAD), or translated as High-Performance Maintenance, the concept of TPM is alive and well at the company's six plants in Mexico. Perhaps the best example is at CCM's brewery in Tecate, located a short drive from the U.S.-Mexico border on the Baja California peninsula.
See More
