Electrical Troubleshooting in Seven Steps
www.pdma.com
Posted 8-16-04
A boiler feed pump being powered by two 3500 hp induction
motors appears to be developing a problem. Failure of this
pump will
result in the loss of a generator currently producing half
of the station’s power output. Operators are complaining
that a large compressor on several occasions has failed to
start. A controller does not sound the way it used to. A cooling
fan has developed an audible “beat” sound during
operation.
One of the most rewarding aspects of working as an electrician
is taking such compelling evidence as “appears to be
developing a problem,” determining what is actually going
on, and making a sound decision on the correct course of action.
Successfully troubleshooting a complex piece of equipment gives
a technician a tremendous sense of satisfaction. Having an
effective troubleshooting plan and following it can help obtain
this feeling of satisfaction.
This article presents an overview of a simple, but effective,
method of investigating an electrical problem. Use this seven-step
process when presented with a complex problem:
• Gather the information
•
Understand the malfunction
•
Identify which parameters need to be evaluated
•
Identify the source of the problem
•
Correct/repair the component
•
Verify the repair
•
Perform root cause analysis
1. Gather information
Gathering information is a logical first step in any troubleshooting
endeavor. Ask about or perform the following:
•
What technical documentation about the equipment is available?
•
How exactly is the equipment supposed to operate?
•
Are there any previous lessons learned?
•
Review any material history that exists for the equipment.
•
Identify similar equipment to which you can compare the malfunctioning
equipment. (This can be especially helpful if there is limited
technical data available for the equipment that is malfunctioning.)
Let us apply step 1 to the boiler feed pump example.
For a high-cost repair like a boiler feed pump, the importance
of answering or performing as many of the listed items before
considering a repair activity is vital. Applying the first
step resulted in a review of the equipment’s current
signature analysis (CSA) and vibration analysis material history.
During this review it was noted that the amplitude of the pole
pass frequency in the CSA had increased for both of the motors
powering the pump. However, vibration analysis did not indicate
any possible problems, either mechanical or electrical.
Now that you have identified technical resources and equipment
operation, you are in a position to understand the malfunction.
2. Understand the malfunction
Understanding the malfunction means that you understand how
or what the process is and what portion of the process is
operating incorrectly. Answer these questions:
•
How is the process supposed to work?
•
What is not functioning as it should?
•
What would cause these results or malfunction?
Applying step 2, the boiler feed pump in question has not
been reported by operations to have a problem but the field
technicians, through the use of predictive tools, have trended
a possible anomaly. Rotor defects, bearing misalignment, magnetic
offset, or abnormal load fluctuations were determined to be
possible causes of the pole pass frequency trending upward.
3. Identify which parameters need to be evaluated
Identifying which parameters need to be evaluated requires
a clear understanding of the discrepancy and which signals
affect the suspected component. Which input signals control
the component? What is the expected output from the suspect
circuit? Is there a timing delay, sequence, or set point
that can be verified?
Identify the parameters that need to be recorded which could
either confirm or refute your suspicions regarding the problem.
Identify the following:
•
What parameters can you measure?
•
What are the expected values for any measurements that are
to be taken?
•
What test equipment is needed?
•
Is there access for the required readings?
•
Is there an alternative method to gather the required readings?
•
Could other components have been affected by this fault?
For step 3, gaining access to the high voltage cables supplying
the boiler feed pump motors would prove to be difficult. However,
testing from the current and potential transformers (CTs and
PTs) offers an easy alternative method to gather the required
voltage and current signals to assist in troubleshooting.
Having performed the first three steps, it is time to perform
the required measurements and observations to identify the
faulty component. Ensure that all required safety procedures
are adhered to while performing any test.
4. Identify the source of the problem
Identifying the source of the problem requires the technician
to isolate components and evaluate circuit parameters, to
isolate the circuit by group when dealing with a complicated
circuit (half-step approach), and to identify the malfunctioning
component using the recorded data.
One test recommended for confirming a possible anomaly and
establishing a severity is a current profile comparison between
two like machines. This is sometimes referred to as a process
analysis test. Fig. 1 shows current samples from two identical
machines. The MCEMAX in-rush/start-up test is a capture of
a single channel of RMS enveloped current for up to 60 seconds.
The test has a sampling rate of 3600 samples per second and
produces a digital strip chart of RMS current.
In this example there is a considerable difference between
the Unit 3 and Unit 4 motors. With this limited information,
a technician would at least have strong evidence that further
investigation and possible action on the Unit 4 motor is necessary.
The current modulations seen in Fig. 1 will create torque
variations and possible degradation of electrical and mechanical
components if left alone. Step 4 calls for more detailed analysis
of the data available to isolate the source of the problem.
To provide further analysis from the current spectrum, Advanced
Spectral Analysis (ASA) uses current demodulation to identify
and separate each of the specific frequencies that are modulating
the current. By correlating these frequencies to the electrical
and mechanical components of the motor pump assembly, the technician
can determine which component is creating the largest impact.
The demodulation process removes the 60 Hz frequency component
from the captured current signal. Removing that component allows
repetitive torque variations developed by mechanical items
such as belts and gears, which were previously lost in the
signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum, to be identified. These
mechanical frequencies are transmitted to the current signature
via the air gap flux of the motor during operation.
Applying step 4 to the boiler feed pump, Fig. 2 shows the
demodulated current spectrums from one of the motors taken
approximately 1 year apart. The pole pass frequency (FP) has
been isolated for evaluation of the change in amplitude over
time. The other motor had similar results. It was the increase
in the FP amplitude that raised concern over the condition
of the equipment.
Additional testing was performed with particular attention
to evaluating the condition of the motor’s rotor. It
was determined after gathering additional vibration, motor
circuit analysis, and current signature data that the equipment
needed to be removed from service for repairs. What made this
decision especially difficult was that the vibration data was
inconclusive. Of several surveys taken on the equipment at
different times, only one showed any signs of increased vibration
levels.
Armed with data, you now can determine what needs to be done
with the suspect component. Many times after the first round
of troubleshooting, the first three steps may need to be repeated;
however, now you have additional data to work with.
5. Correct/repair the component
Correct or repair the component identified as damaged based
on the recorded data. Perform the required repairs to the
circuit. Completing step 5 can range from simple adjustments
to a complete component replacement.
For the boiler feed pump, when inspecting the two motors,
the technicians found that one motor had bent/damaged rotor
bars. The damage to the rotor was no surprise due to the elevated
pole pass frequency indications during the current signature
analysis. But why only one of the rotors when both of the motors
had elevated values? Technicians felt that since both motors
were mounted to a common shaft, it would not be unusual for
the elevated pole pass frequency of one motor to be transmitted
through the shaft to the other.
In addition to the rotor bar degradation, technicians discovered
severe damage to the load end bearings of each motor. During
initial installation, the magnetic center was not properly
set for one, or possibly both, of the motors, which led to
axial thrusting of the drive shaft, causing the bearing damage.
Technicians conducted inspections of similar boiler feed pump
installations to ensure that both motors were properly aligned
with regard to magnetic center.
6. Verify the repair
Verify the repair after completion. Ensure the equipment is
operating as designed. Perform another round of testing to
verify the equipment is in fact running correctly and that
no other discrepancies exist.
Following the repair and installation of the boiler feed pump
motors, or the installation of replacement motors, retest to
ensure the installation will not result in the same failure
mechanism in the future. Looking at another example, a high
resistance joint in the connection box of a 460 V ac induction
motor was identified (see “High Resistance Connection
Test Results”). The motor lugs were replaced and retaped,
resulting in a 3 percent reduction in resistive imbalance and
a cleared alarm.
7. Perform root cause analysis
Performing root cause analysis, even though mentioned last,
began in the first step of the troubleshooting process. You
should use the knowledge gained throughout the troubleshooting
process in determining what could have possibly caused the
component to fail.
Did the component fail prematurely? Why are the motor windings
failing after only four years of service? These are just a
couple of the questions that may come to light when evaluating
the whole repair process. Without identifying the possible
cause that led to the failure, the repair will always be only
temporary. While working through the troubleshooting process,
ask yourself, “Is this the root cause or just a symptom
of the problem?”
When attempting to determine the cause of increased motor
running temperature, a technician recorded the RMS current
to the motor. The process powered by the motor involves constantly
changing speeds and loads, shown in Fig. 3. With the in-rush/start-up
current capture providing a graph of current throughout the
repetitive cycle, it was readily apparent why the motor temperature
was running so high. The level horizontal line indicates nameplate
full load current.
Using this data, the technicians determined that the motor
was undersized for the varying load it was driving. Repairing
the heat-damaged motor would not have been a permanent solution
to the problem. Installing a motor only slightly larger than
the original resulted in an installation where motor operating
temperature is well within the temperature ratings of its insulation
system.
By following a well thought-out systematic process when challenged
with an electrical troubleshooting problem, you will greatly
enhance your effectiveness. Invest a little time up front doing
your research and determining your troubleshooting plan of
action. A benefit of newer test equipment packages, which combine
multiple testing technologies in one unit, is how much they
increase the flexibility and capability of a technician’s
troubleshooting toolbox.
Inventory your test equipment and determine what you have
available when the opportunity to use the seven-step troubleshooting
process presents itself.
Information supplied by PdMA Corp., 5909-C Hampton Oaks Pkwy.,
Tampa, FL 33610; (800) 476-6463; e-mail pdma@
pdma.com
Fig. 1. RMS current captures from two identical machines show
a considerable difference between the units’ motors.
Fig. 2. A demodulation process removes the 60 Hz frequency
component from the captured current signal, allowing repetitive
torque variations developed by mechanical items to be identified.
These two demodulated current spectrums are from one of the
motors on the boiler feed pump taken approximately 1 year apart.
The pole pass frequency (FP) has been isolated for evaluation
of the change in amplitude over time.
Fig. 3. To determine a reason for increased motor running
temperature, a technician recorded the RMS current to the motor.
The process powered by the motor involves constantly changing
speeds and loads. The red horizontal line indicates nameplate
full load current. Using this data, the technician determined
that the motor was undersized for the varying load it was driving.
HIGH RESISTANCE CONNECTION TEST RESULTS
Test Date |
|
|
Test ID: |
|
|
Voltage |
|
|
Motor Temp |
|
|
Measured Mohm |
|
|
Corrected Mohm |
|
|
pF Ph 1 to Gnd |
|
|
ohm Ph 1 to 2 |
|
|
ohm Ph 1 to 3 |
|
|
ohm Ph 2 to 3 |
|
|
mH Ph 1 to 2 |
|
|
mH Ph 1 to 3 |
|
|
mH Ph 2 to 3 |
|
|
% Res. Imbalance |
|
|
% Ind. Imbalance |
|
|
$ Power Loss |
|
|
Condition Code |
|
|
In retesting after repairs, a high resistance joint in the
connection box of a
460 V ac induction motor was identified. The motor lugs were
replaced and
retaped, resulting in a 3 percent reduction in resistive imbalance
and a cleared alarm.
|